Locofy vs Builder.io Fusion
Locofy and Builder.io Fusion (formerly Visual Copilot) are both Figma-to-code tools, but they differ in approach. Locofy focuses on broad framework support including mobile (Flutter, React Native) and offers two conversion modes. Fusion's killer feature is semantic component mapping — it maps Figma elements to your existing codebase components. Fusion is the better choice for teams with established design systems; Locofy wins for mobile-first projects and multi-framework needs.
Locofy
Choose if: You need mobile output (React Native or Flutter) or want to convert designs across many frameworks without an existing component library.
AI-powered Figma design-to-code converter
Builder.io Fusion
Choose if: You have an established design system and want Figma-to-code that maps to your existing components automatically.
AI Figma-to-code with design system mapping
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Locofy | Builder.io Fusion |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $33/mo (annual) | $19/mo✓ |
| Pricing model | Token-based consumption | Per-seat subscription |
| Design system mapping | Reusable component detection | AI semantic matching to your codebase✓ |
| Mobile support | React Native, Flutter✓ | React Native only |
| Web frameworks | React, Next.js, Vue, Angular | React, Vue, Svelte, Angular, Qwik, Solid✓ |
| CSS/styling options | CSS Modules, Tailwind | Tailwind, Emotion, Styled Components, CSS✓ |
| Conversion modes | Lightning (one-click) + Classic (step-by-step)✓ | Single AI conversion flow |
| Affiliate program | No | Yes — 20% year 1, 15% year 2, 10% ongoing✓ |
| Best for | Cross-platform and mobile projects | Enterprise teams with design systems |
Pricing Comparison
Locofy
| Free | $0 |
| Starter | $33/mo |
| ProPopular | $100/mo |
+ Token-based usage — complex designs consume more tokens, Pay-as-you-go rate is $0.40/token vs $0.20/token on Pro, Annual billing required for Starter and Pro plans
Builder.io Fusion
| Free | $0 |
| ProPopular | $30/mo |
| Team | $50/mo |
| Enterprise | Custom |
+ Previously called Visual Copilot, now rebranded as Fusion, Enterprise required for advanced publishing and CMS features
Pricing last verified: 2026-07-07
Locofy: Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +Supports many frameworks: React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, React Native, Flutter
- +Two conversion modes — Lightning (AI one-click) and Classic (step-by-step)
- +AI-powered responsiveness and reusable component detection
- +Figma plugin integration for seamless workflow
Limitations
- -Output quality depends heavily on how well-organized your Figma file is
- -Slow processing on larger designs — struggles beyond 5+ frames
- -Token-based pricing can get expensive for large projects
- -Generated code often needs manual cleanup before production use
Builder.io Fusion: Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +AI semantic matching maps Figma components to your existing codebase components
- +Supports React, Vue, Svelte, Angular, Qwik, Solid, React Native, and HTML
- +Trained on 2M+ data points — generates cleaner code than generic Figma-to-code tools
- +Integrates with Tailwind, Emotion, Styled Components, and plain CSS
Limitations
- -Gets you roughly 75% of the way — generated code still needs manual polish
- -Initial component mapping setup can be time-consuming for complex design systems
- -Mobile/responsive adjustments often need manual code tweaks
- -Part of the broader Builder.io platform — can feel heavyweight if you only want Figma-to-code
Which One Should You Pick?
Locofy is best for: Design-to-dev teams who want to convert Figma files into multi-framework frontend code.
Builder.io Fusion is best for: Frontend teams who want AI Figma-to-code with automatic design system component mapping.
Last updated: 2026-07-07